It was a composer’s Cinderella story: a CD/DVD project with symphony orchestra and all my original music. 7 cameras, a director, designers, producer, Union negotiations, makeup artists … and did I mention the full symphony orchestra?
The video would go beyond simple documentation to truly bringing an audience into my world, my experience as an orchestra composer and soloist. I didn’t know at the time, but it would eventually be shown on PBS stations all over the US, and the CD would get a GRAMMY® Nomination. I’d sit in the dark, waiting to see if my name was called, terrified about tripping on my way to the podium. Then keenly disappointed that I didn’t have that chance. A huge, rich, vibrant slice of life most composers only dream of.
And all of it was made possible by one man, a philanthropist – and now my friend — Peter Wege. He’d walked up to me after my first concert with his regional orchestra, the Grand Rapids Symphony, and he said, “What I saw out there on stage, I want the whole world to see.”
And he meant it.
When he invited me to submit a proposal for a project, I knew this was the chance of a lifetime. My husband, producer Jonathan Wyner, encouraged me to propose a project that was not just about my music, but about me as a performer, something that could bring the audience into the very middle of my work for electric harp and symphony orchestra. That meant making a DVD as well as a CD.
Once the project was approved, I spent over a year simply preparing the music, rehearsing and practicing. And this was after 10 years I’d spent writing, performing and editing the pieces. Meanwhile, Jonathan, as the producer, was spending all his time putting together the greatest team he could find, watching video after video to find the best lighting designer, the best director, editor, production company and graphic designer he could. We’d never done a project like this, so were assembling a team from scratch, but he already had ideas of some of the ‘dream people’ he wanted to work with, like multi-Grammy winning audio engineer Tom Bates.
So while Jonathan’s challenge was to assemble the team, my biggest artistic challenge was that I was the composer, the orchestrator and the soloist. I had a year of work to do as composer and orchestrator – but my performance was what the audience would actually see. The 3 days of taping (one of which was my birthday) were high stakes: each minute on stage cost over $1000. The key to my being free and focused as a performer in those high-pressure moments — as well as the key to the crew’s being able to capture it — was to be completely prepared, and for everyone on the team to know the material.
I knew that the best way to do that was to practice the project in miniature as much as we could before the official shooting. We needed to make what my architect friend Fred calls a “Maquette” – a mockup .
So Jonathan and I created two musical “Maquettes,” Instead of a 70-piece orchestra, we used a 9-piece ensemble that represented the orchestra. Instead of a 2,000 seat hall, we used two small local theaters Instead of a ballet company, my dancer-friend Karen Montanaro created on-the-spot choreography and two volunteers held silk streamers; instead of 7 cameras and a huge editing truck, filmmaker Ian Brownell taped with 3 cameras and edited it himself … and so on.
It meant I had to write the music twice in many cases: once for chamber ensemble, and then for full symphony. But that was the only way we could test the whole project and see how it would work on stage. It would also create the foundation for chamber music repertoire with harp – another dream of mine – but that’s another story. We scheduled 2 Maquette performances, with a few months between them, for me to edit or create new material.
So these two Maquettes became part of the scaffolding of the final orchestral project. They allowed us to practice the music and the moves, and the edited videos became reference clips to help the director and lighting designer to envision the final project, since they came in fairly late in the game.
But the Maquettes themselves were real performances, and these ‘miniature’ chamber music versions were as fun and challenging to play as the full-orchestra versions. And since we had a limit on how much orchestral music we could include in the final release, they also include some music that never made it into the final project.
Now that the final project has been out for a few years, I lan to release the Maquette versions on YouTube as part of my 2011-2011 “Re-DHC” project. In part I want to release them because I love them for what they are – and in part I want people to have the opportunity to compare the two versions, so that students of orchestration can see examples of the same piece in ensemble form and full symphonic form, and so that other performers interesting in learning and programming these pieces, can see how they work in the more economical chamber music versions.
These releases are part of my “Re-DHC” blog project, a year of weekly releases of projects that are sitting on my shelves … some that are “done” and were simply never released, and some that will never be ‘done’ and that I want to share in their ‘final’ sketch-form.
(As soon as I get the first ones up I’ll link them to this blog)
It’s easy for a beginner like me to look at finished projects from artists I admire and think, “Dang! How will I ever manage to create anything that good?” Of course, I’m forgetting all the unseen iterations that went before! It’s so encouraging when an artist is willing to pull back the curtain and reveal the process; it reminds me that even the most accomplished among us still have to work stuff out. I look forward to seeing more of the gestation of “Invention and Alchemy.”
The other sketches you plan to share sound interesting, too. Back before MP3s, I collected vinyl because it was the only way to get my hands on non-album cuts and demo versions. I love the whole “singing in the shower” vibe of demos … the sloppier the better! So intimate and human. Do you plan to share some of your demos? (hint, hint)
Hmmmm…. some of my demos …. let me give that some thought! Right now I’m challenged by my own ‘perfectionism’ (you know, the resistance and tinkering that ultimately makes things way worse?) — and using this project to push myself to get *anything* on line.
I’ll try all sorts of things ON STAGE that would make other performers cringe, but the minute it hints of being taped, I go all queazy. (Hmmm… maybe because of how mercilessly my cousins teased me about the stupid letters I sent them, trying to sound like I knew how to write) (That just occurred to me) (I will send them my therapist’s bill) (but first will have to find a therapist).
It’s really helpful knowing that pulling back the curtain helps others. Feel free to keep hinting! It will help! (DHC)
The roughest demos and drafts might feel too personal to share; I can get that. Different versions are cool, though. When I found a copy of “Alter Ego,” I had fun comparing it with “Altered Ego,” looking at the differences, thinking about what you’d changed, paying attention to what worked best. I learned a lot and found myself wishing all my favorite musicians would release “altered” versions of their albums. This is probably a manifestation of my own perfectionist streak … wanting to pull stuff apart to see how it ticks, to understand how the artist put it together originally, in the hope of applying those insights to my own work someday. It is indeed helpful to see behind the scenes!